Deepseek Deepseek V3 vs Alibaba Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct
Detailed comparison for LLMs
On Guardion's LLM vulnerability Benchmark, Deepseek Deepseek V3 is the more secure of the two: Deepseek V3 scores 47.2% and Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct scores 48.0% on attack success rate (ASR) (lower is better). One or both scores are estimated from public safety evaluations pending a Guardion benchmark run.
Head-to-Head Overview
Deepseek V3 is the overall winner in this comparison!
Attack Success Rate (lower is safer)
ASR for Deepseek Deepseek V3 vs Alibaba Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct. Green marks the safer model on each metric. Only the overall score is available for estimated models.
Overall (ASR)
TAP Attack Method (ASR)
Crescendo Attack Method (ASR)
Zero-Shot (ASR)
Key Highlights
- Deepseek Deepseek V3 has a lower Overall (ASR).
- Deepseek Deepseek V3 has a lower TAP Attack Method (ASR).
- Deepseek Deepseek V3 has a lower Crescendo Attack Method (ASR).
- Deepseek Deepseek V3 has a lower Zero-Shot (ASR).
Security Profile
Outward is better on every axis.
Frequently asked questions
Is Deepseek Deepseek V3 or Alibaba Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct more secure?
On Guardion's LLM vulnerability Benchmark, Deepseek Deepseek V3 is the more secure of the two: Deepseek V3 scores 47.2% and Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct scores 48.0% on attack success rate (ASR) (lower is better). One or both scores are estimated from public safety evaluations pending a Guardion benchmark run.
What is the attack success rate (ASR) of Deepseek V3 vs Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct?
Deepseek V3 has a 47.2% ASR and Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct has a 48.0% ASR — the share of adversarial prompts that succeed across zero-shot, TAP, and Crescendo attacks. Lower is safer.
How were Deepseek V3 and Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct tested?
Both were red-teamed with the HarmBench framework across zero-shot, TAP (Tree of Attacks with Pruning), and Crescendo multi-turn attacks, scored by Attack Success Rate.