Meta Llama 3H 405B vs Alibaba Qwen 7-72BB
Detailed comparison for LLMs
On Guardion's LLM vulnerability Benchmark, Alibaba Qwen 7-72BB is the more secure of the two: Llama 3H 405B scores 36.6% and Qwen 7-72BB scores 36.5% on attack success rate (ASR) (lower is better).
Head-to-Head Overview
Qwen 7-72BB is the overall winner in this comparison!
Attack Success Rate (lower is safer)
ASR for Meta Llama 3H 405B vs Alibaba Qwen 7-72BB. Green marks the safer model on each metric.
Overall (ASR)
Zero-Shot (ASR)
Key Highlights
- Alibaba Qwen 7-72BB has a lower Overall (ASR).
- Alibaba Qwen 7-72BB has a lower Zero-Shot (ASR).
Frequently asked questions
Is Meta Llama 3H 405B or Alibaba Qwen 7-72BB more secure?
On Guardion's LLM vulnerability Benchmark, Alibaba Qwen 7-72BB is the more secure of the two: Llama 3H 405B scores 36.6% and Qwen 7-72BB scores 36.5% on attack success rate (ASR) (lower is better).
What is the attack success rate (ASR) of Llama 3H 405B vs Qwen 7-72BB?
Llama 3H 405B has a 36.6% ASR and Qwen 7-72BB has a 36.5% ASR — the share of adversarial prompts that succeed across zero-shot, TAP, and Crescendo attacks. Lower is safer.
How were Llama 3H 405B and Qwen 7-72BB tested?
Both were red-teamed with the HarmBench framework across zero-shot, TAP (Tree of Attacks with Pruning), and Crescendo multi-turn attacks, scored by Attack Success Rate.