Mistral Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct 2512 NVFP4 vs Google Gemini 2.0 Flash

Detailed comparison for LLMs

MistralGoogle

On Guardion's LLM vulnerability Benchmark, Google Gemini 2.0 Flash is the more secure of the two: Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct 2512 NVFP4 scores 34.0% and Gemini 2.0 Flash scores 33.6% on attack success rate (ASR) (lower is better). One or both scores are estimated from public safety evaluations pending a Guardion benchmark run.

Head-to-Head Overview

Gemini 2.0 Flash is the overall winner in this comparison!

Attack Success Rate (lower is safer)

ASR for Mistral Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct 2512 NVFP4 vs Google Gemini 2.0 Flash. Green marks the safer model on each metric. Only the overall score is available for estimated models.

Overall (ASR)

Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct 2512 NVFP4
34.0%
Gemini 2.0 Flash
33.6%

TAP Attack Method (ASR)

Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct 2512 NVFP4
100.0%
Gemini 2.0 Flash
67.6%

Crescendo Attack Method (ASR)

Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct 2512 NVFP4
100.0%
Gemini 2.0 Flash
30.4%

Zero-Shot (ASR)

Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct 2512 NVFP4
100.0%
Gemini 2.0 Flash
2.8%

Key Highlights

  • Google Gemini 2.0 Flash has a lower Overall (ASR).
  • Google Gemini 2.0 Flash has a lower TAP Attack Method (ASR).
  • Google Gemini 2.0 Flash has a lower Crescendo Attack Method (ASR).
  • Google Gemini 2.0 Flash has a lower Zero-Shot (ASR).

Security Profile

Outward is better on every axis.

OverallTAPCrescendoZero-Shot
Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct 2512 NVFP4
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Full security profile
Mistral Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct 2512 NVFP4
Full security profile
Google Gemini 2.0 Flash

Frequently asked questions

Is Mistral Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct 2512 NVFP4 or Google Gemini 2.0 Flash more secure?

On Guardion's LLM vulnerability Benchmark, Google Gemini 2.0 Flash is the more secure of the two: Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct 2512 NVFP4 scores 34.0% and Gemini 2.0 Flash scores 33.6% on attack success rate (ASR) (lower is better). One or both scores are estimated from public safety evaluations pending a Guardion benchmark run.

What is the attack success rate (ASR) of Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct 2512 NVFP4 vs Gemini 2.0 Flash?

Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct 2512 NVFP4 has a 34.0% ASR and Gemini 2.0 Flash has a 33.6% ASR — the share of adversarial prompts that succeed across zero-shot, TAP, and Crescendo attacks. Lower is safer.

How were Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct 2512 NVFP4 and Gemini 2.0 Flash tested?

Both were red-teamed with the HarmBench framework across zero-shot, TAP (Tree of Attacks with Pruning), and Crescendo multi-turn attacks, scored by Attack Success Rate.

Related Comparisons