Mistral Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct 2512 vs Mistral Mistral Large 2
Detailed comparison for LLMs
On Guardion's LLM vulnerability Benchmark, Mistral Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct 2512 is the more secure of the two: Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct 2512 scores 33.0% and Mistral Large 2 scores 42.0% on attack success rate (ASR) (lower is better). One or both scores are estimated from public safety evaluations pending a Guardion benchmark run.
Head-to-Head Overview
Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct 2512 is the overall winner in this comparison!
Attack Success Rate (lower is safer)
ASR for Mistral Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct 2512 vs Mistral Mistral Large 2. Green marks the safer model on each metric. Only the overall score is available for estimated models.
Overall (ASR)
TAP Attack Method (ASR)
Crescendo Attack Method (ASR)
Zero-Shot (ASR)
Key Highlights
- Mistral Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct 2512 has a lower Overall (ASR).
Security Profile
Outward is better on every axis.
Frequently asked questions
Is Mistral Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct 2512 or Mistral Mistral Large 2 more secure?
On Guardion's LLM vulnerability Benchmark, Mistral Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct 2512 is the more secure of the two: Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct 2512 scores 33.0% and Mistral Large 2 scores 42.0% on attack success rate (ASR) (lower is better). One or both scores are estimated from public safety evaluations pending a Guardion benchmark run.
What is the attack success rate (ASR) of Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct 2512 vs Mistral Large 2?
Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct 2512 has a 33.0% ASR and Mistral Large 2 has a 42.0% ASR — the share of adversarial prompts that succeed across zero-shot, TAP, and Crescendo attacks. Lower is safer.
How were Mistral Large 3 675B Instruct 2512 and Mistral Large 2 tested?
Both were red-teamed with the HarmBench framework across zero-shot, TAP (Tree of Attacks with Pruning), and Crescendo multi-turn attacks, scored by Attack Success Rate.