Mistral Mixtral 8x7B vs Mistral Ministral 3 14B Reasoning 2512
Detailed comparison for LLMs
On Guardion's LLM vulnerability Benchmark, Mistral Mixtral 8x7B is the more secure of the two: Mixtral 8x7B scores 38.0% and Ministral 3 14B Reasoning 2512 scores 40.0% on attack success rate (ASR) (lower is better). One or both scores are estimated from public safety evaluations pending a Guardion benchmark run.
Head-to-Head Overview
Mixtral 8x7B is the overall winner in this comparison!
Attack Success Rate (lower is safer)
ASR for Mistral Mixtral 8x7B vs Mistral Ministral 3 14B Reasoning 2512. Green marks the safer model on each metric. Only the overall score is available for estimated models.
Overall (ASR)
TAP Attack Method (ASR)
Crescendo Attack Method (ASR)
Zero-Shot (ASR)
Key Highlights
- Mistral Mixtral 8x7B has a lower Overall (ASR).
- Mistral Mixtral 8x7B has a lower TAP Attack Method (ASR).
- Mistral Mixtral 8x7B has a lower Crescendo Attack Method (ASR).
- Mistral Mixtral 8x7B has a lower Zero-Shot (ASR).
Security Profile
Outward is better on every axis.
Frequently asked questions
Is Mistral Mixtral 8x7B or Mistral Ministral 3 14B Reasoning 2512 more secure?
On Guardion's LLM vulnerability Benchmark, Mistral Mixtral 8x7B is the more secure of the two: Mixtral 8x7B scores 38.0% and Ministral 3 14B Reasoning 2512 scores 40.0% on attack success rate (ASR) (lower is better). One or both scores are estimated from public safety evaluations pending a Guardion benchmark run.
What is the attack success rate (ASR) of Mixtral 8x7B vs Ministral 3 14B Reasoning 2512?
Mixtral 8x7B has a 38.0% ASR and Ministral 3 14B Reasoning 2512 has a 40.0% ASR — the share of adversarial prompts that succeed across zero-shot, TAP, and Crescendo attacks. Lower is safer.
How were Mixtral 8x7B and Ministral 3 14B Reasoning 2512 tested?
Both were red-teamed with the HarmBench framework across zero-shot, TAP (Tree of Attacks with Pruning), and Crescendo multi-turn attacks, scored by Attack Success Rate.