Deepseek Deepseek R1: LLM Security & Jailbreak Resistance
As of 2026-07-04, Deepseek Deepseek R1 has an attack success rate (ASR) of 42.6% on Guardion's LLM Vulnerability benchmark — ranking #65 of 93 models. It is weakly resistant — adversarial prompts succeed often without added guardrails.
Attack Success Rate (ASR) is the share of adversarial prompts that elicit harmful output across zero-shot, TAP, and Crescendo attacks (HarmBench framework). Lower is safer. "Est." models are calibrated from public safety evaluations pending a Guardion benchmark run.
How Deepseek R1 compares
Frequently asked questions
How secure is Deepseek Deepseek R1 against jailbreaks?
Deepseek Deepseek R1 is weakly resistant — adversarial prompts succeed often without added guardrails. On Guardion's LLM Vulnerability benchmark it records a 42.6% attack success rate (57.4% robustness), ranking #65 of 93 models.
What is Deepseek R1's attack success rate (ASR)?
Deepseek R1's overall ASR is 42.6% — the share of adversarial prompts that elicit harmful output across zero-shot, TAP, and Crescendo attacks. Lower is safer.
Is Deepseek R1 more secure than Deepseek V3?
Deepseek R1 is more robust: 42.6% ASR vs Deepseek V3's 47.2%. See the full head-to-head comparison for the per-attack breakdown.
How can I make Deepseek R1 safer to deploy?
Even robust models are bypassed under sustained attack. An inline runtime guardrail that classifies prompts and responses — like Guardion's prompt-defense models — blocks jailbreaks and prompt injection before they reach Deepseek R1.
Harden Deepseek R1 in production
Guardion's runtime guardrails block jailbreaks and prompt injection before they reach any model — with sub-130ms policy decisions.
Request a demo