DeepSeek DeepSeek VL2: LLM Security & Jailbreak Resistance
As of 2026-07-04, DeepSeek DeepSeek VL2 has an attack success rate (ASR) of 52.0% on Guardion's LLM Vulnerability benchmark — ranking #87 of 93 models. It is highly vulnerable — most adversarial prompts succeed without an external guardrail.
Attack Success Rate (ASR) is the share of adversarial prompts that elicit harmful output across zero-shot, TAP, and Crescendo attacks (HarmBench framework). Lower is safer. "Est." models are calibrated from public safety evaluations pending a Guardion benchmark run.
How DeepSeek VL2 compares
Frequently asked questions
How secure is DeepSeek DeepSeek VL2 against jailbreaks?
DeepSeek DeepSeek VL2 is highly vulnerable — most adversarial prompts succeed without an external guardrail. On Guardion's LLM Vulnerability benchmark it records a 52.0% attack success rate (48% robustness), ranking #87 of 93 models (estimated from public safety evaluations).
What is DeepSeek VL2's attack success rate (ASR)?
DeepSeek VL2's overall ASR is 52.0% — the share of adversarial prompts that elicit harmful output across zero-shot, TAP, and Crescendo attacks. Lower is safer.
Is DeepSeek VL2 more secure than DeepSeek-R1-0528?
DeepSeek-R1-0528 is more robust: 41.0% ASR vs DeepSeek VL2's 52.0%. See the full head-to-head comparison for the per-attack breakdown.
How can I make DeepSeek VL2 safer to deploy?
Even robust models are bypassed under sustained attack. An inline runtime guardrail that classifies prompts and responses — like Guardion's prompt-defense models — blocks jailbreaks and prompt injection before they reach DeepSeek VL2.
Harden DeepSeek VL2 in production
Guardion's runtime guardrails block jailbreaks and prompt injection before they reach any model — with sub-130ms policy decisions.
Request a demo