Amazon Nova Premier vs Deepseek Deepseek R1

Detailed comparison for LLMs

AmazonDeepseek

On Guardion's LLM vulnerability Benchmark, Amazon Nova Premier is the more secure of the two: Nova Premier scores 20.0% and Deepseek R1 scores 42.6% on attack success rate (ASR) (lower is better). One or both scores are estimated from public safety evaluations pending a Guardion benchmark run.

Head-to-Head Overview

Nova Premier is the overall winner in this comparison!

Attack Success Rate (lower is safer)

ASR for Amazon Nova Premier vs Deepseek Deepseek R1. Green marks the safer model on each metric. Only the overall score is available for estimated models.

Overall (ASR)

Nova Premier
20.0%
Deepseek R1
42.6%

TAP Attack Method (ASR)

Nova Premier
Deepseek R1
76.9%

Crescendo Attack Method (ASR)

Nova Premier
Deepseek R1
34.8%

Zero-Shot (ASR)

Nova Premier
Deepseek R1
16.1%

Key Highlights

  • Amazon Nova Premier has a lower Overall (ASR).

Security Profile

Outward is better on every axis.

OverallTAPCrescendoZero-Shot
Nova Premier
Deepseek R1
Full security profile
Amazon Nova Premier
Full security profile
Deepseek Deepseek R1

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon Nova Premier or Deepseek Deepseek R1 more secure?

On Guardion's LLM vulnerability Benchmark, Amazon Nova Premier is the more secure of the two: Nova Premier scores 20.0% and Deepseek R1 scores 42.6% on attack success rate (ASR) (lower is better). One or both scores are estimated from public safety evaluations pending a Guardion benchmark run.

What is the attack success rate (ASR) of Nova Premier vs Deepseek R1?

Nova Premier has a 20.0% ASR and Deepseek R1 has a 42.6% ASR — the share of adversarial prompts that succeed across zero-shot, TAP, and Crescendo attacks. Lower is safer.

How were Nova Premier and Deepseek R1 tested?

Both were red-teamed with the HarmBench framework across zero-shot, TAP (Tree of Attacks with Pruning), and Crescendo multi-turn attacks, scored by Attack Success Rate.

Related Comparisons